Things
are finally getting back to normal around here after the trip to the States and
a short run up to Normandy. And that means the struggle to learn enough of this
language to preserve my honor continues in earnest. This week's lesson was all
about the subjunctive. Before Wednesday, I couldn't have told you
what this was in English. Just so you know, in the sentence, "In France, it is important that I be speaking French", be speaking is the subjunctive - I think.
When I started studying Spanish at nearly 30 years old, and learned terms like indicative and imperative, the only reason I had been even vaguely aware of such things in English was because one of the guys had brought a Playboy - several actually- to band camp my senior year in high school. In one of them was the following joke: “A man is on his first visit to Boston, and he wants to try some of that delicious New England seafood that he’d long heard about. So he gets into a cab and asks the driver, ‘Can you take me to where I can get scrod?’ The driver replies, ‘I’ve heard that question a thousand times, but never in the pluperfect subjunctive.’” Of course we all laughed uproariously while, except for the scrod part, having no fucking idea what this meant. I'm still not sure and after a year and a half in France I'm only marginally able to carry on even the simplest conversations yet children know how to use the subjunctive. I'm considering wearing a sign labeled "MUET" (mute) and just communicating in hand signals.
A
large part of my problem is because of how French is pronounced and the way I
hear it. In the first place, one of the basic principles of speech here seems
to be to condense entire sentences into a single word. For example, on the tape
I was listening to today was Il a bu de
l'eau, He drank some water. This comes out sounding like ilabooduloh. When
I was trying to learn Spanish and even German, I could almost always hear the individual
words. This has been almost impossible for me in French and as a result I have
to listen with all my might. It is not unlike the strain associated with trying
to relieve constipation.
Another
big factor for me is the way you pronounce things and how your mouth forms the
sounds. Let's take something in French that most people, even Americans, are
familiar with - Champs Élysées, which mean Elysian Fields and is pronounced shawseleeZAY, again like one word.
You'll notice that three letters are missing, the m and p in Champs and the final s in Élysées. (By the way, if you don't
include the accent marks the word is misspelled unless you're in the UK, then
it's misspelt.) Final esses at the end of a word are usually not pronounced unless the next word
starts with a vowel, which is why you hear the "s" in Champs. The m and p aren't enunciated,
just because, but that doesn't mean they have no effect. Their presence
indicates that the ending of the word will be uttered nasally which means that
as you say the long "a" you have to stuff the silent letters up your
nose with the back of your tongue. This nasal part is a difficult
concept for Anglo-Saxons as there's no equivalent in English. But at least my
Yankee tongue has an easier time than some folks, like my wife's cousin, whose
instructor at Milsaps College in Jackson, Mississippi, felt compelled to inform
her, "the word oui
does not have three syllables."
I've come up with a theory that French was devised with the purpose of making it so difficult for the English to pick up that they would simply give up, go home and leave them alone. Or maybe they knew instinctively that most of those coming here wouldn't bother to learn it anyway, so why make things easy.
However, I have made some unexpected progress, as we discovered a couple of weeks ago after seeing The Selfish Giant, an English film based on a children's story by Oscar Wilde. By the way, if anyone can explain to me how, other than the title, this flick bears any resemblance to the Wilde story, I'd be obliged. Anyway, after two hours of trying to decipher the character's impenetrable Yorkshire accents, I realized that if there hadn't been French subtitles, I'd have had no idea what was being said most of the time.
However, I have made some unexpected progress, as we discovered a couple of weeks ago after seeing The Selfish Giant, an English film based on a children's story by Oscar Wilde. By the way, if anyone can explain to me how, other than the title, this flick bears any resemblance to the Wilde story, I'd be obliged. Anyway, after two hours of trying to decipher the character's impenetrable Yorkshire accents, I realized that if there hadn't been French subtitles, I'd have had no idea what was being said most of the time.
And last
night a friend of ours from Normandy called and for the first time I understood
probably three fourths of what she told me - at least I think so. But even if
it was only half, it's more than I've ever been able to manage. Unfortunately,
this triumph was followed today by the realization that, in trying to explain
that the mailman had given us her mail by mistake, I told the young woman
across the hall that, well, I'm not really sure what I told her but at least
she got her package.
This
week I was reminded that much of the time, French still
sounds to me like Sid Caesar. I can make out some familiar words but mainly
what I hear is double-talk. Everyone keeps telling me that someday, voilà, I'll get everything that guy just
said. And someday the indicatif, conditionnel
and subjonctif will just roll off my tongue. I
doubt it but it would be nice, once and for all, to finally get that joke I
heard in high school.
No comments:
Post a Comment